- In practice
- 8 years
- Languages
- English
- Reviews
- 3.9 (8)
- Last verified
- —
About
Ruth Tanaka — personal injury lawyer in Atlanta. Fictional demo profile.
Rankings
Score ledger
Personal Injury in Atlanta · ranking v1.0.0Each row shows the component score (0–100), its weight and the points it adds. Open a row to see the records it is based on.
Credentials25 × 20%
Active licence on record but not yet verified against the issuing body.
- Georgia licence — unverified
Relevant experience64 × 15%
7 years practising in this area.
- Relevant years counted: 7
Specialization100 × 15%
Primary practice area; practises in 1 area(s) in total.
- Practice areas: 1
Verified reputation55 × 15%
8 review(s) from 2 source(s), 1.556 effective after recency, verification and authority weighting. Adjusted rating 3.20/5.
- Source #3: 1.087 effective reviews
- Source #4: 0.469 effective reviews
Professional recognition0 × 10%
No professional recognition on record.
Relevant track record0 × 10%
No publicly sourced matters on record.
Client experience43 × 5%
Too few enquiries to measure responsiveness; neutral value blended with verified review volume.
- Verified reviews: 4
Profile & data quality70 × 5%
7 of 10 profile fields complete.
- Missing: Biography (150+ characters)
- Missing: Photo
- Missing: Website
Data freshness38 × 5%
Never verified; last updated 521 days ago (40% penalty).
- Updated: 2025-04-12
Ranking history
Position in personal injury rankings in Atlanta, most recent first.
| Calculated | Position | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | #18 of 22 | 45.4 |
Licences and qualifications
| Jurisdiction | Issuing body | Number | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | State Bar of Georgia | DEMO-US-107294 | 2018 | activeVerification pending |
- LL.M., Commonwealth Law Institute (2020)
Reviews
3.9
8 reviews
Verified client reviews (demo fixture)
3.9 from 4 reviews, 4 verified
Open review platform (demo fixture)
4.0 from 4 reviews, 0 verified
- Hiroshi M.13 Feb 2026Unverified
Explained my options without pressure and in plain language.
- Felix N.9 Nov 2025Verified client
Good result, although the process took longer than expected.
- Amara M.24 Dec 2023Unverified
Well prepared for the hearing and kept me informed throughout.
- Hugo S.9 Jul 2023Unverified
Responsive by phone and email; the fee estimate matched the final bill.
- Grace D.18 May 2022Verified client
Explained my options without pressure and in plain language.
- Aisha O.12 Feb 2022Verified client
Clear explanations at every stage and realistic about likely outcomes.
Offices
Data sources
Every fact on this profile is linked to the record it came from. Profile last changed 12 Apr 2025.
- Licensing registry import (demo fixture)Licensing registry1 record
- Verified client reviews (demo fixture)Review source4 records
- Open review platform (demo fixture)Review source4 records