- In practice
- 5 years
- Languages
- English, Arabic
- Reviews
- 3.8 (25)
- Last verified
- 7 Jun 2026
About
Mateo Dunmore — criminal defense lawyer in Los Angeles. Fictional demo profile.
Rankings
Score ledger
Criminal Defense in Los Angeles · ranking v1.0.0Each row shows the component score (0–100), its weight and the points it adds. Open a row to see the records it is based on.
Credentials70 × 20%
1 verified active licence(s).
- California licence — verified
- Identity and practice verified
Relevant experience43 × 15%
3 years practising in this area.
- Relevant years counted: 3
Specialization100 × 15%
Primary practice area; practises in 1 area(s) in total.
- Practice areas: 1
Verified reputation59 × 15%
25 review(s) from 2 source(s), 5.875 effective after recency, verification and authority weighting. Adjusted rating 3.37/5.
- Source #3: 5.021 effective reviews
- Source #4: 0.853 effective reviews
Professional recognition0 × 10%
No professional recognition on record.
Relevant track record0 × 10%
No publicly sourced matters on record.
Client experience63 × 5%
Too few enquiries to measure responsiveness; neutral value blended with verified review volume.
- Verified reviews: 18
Profile & data quality60 × 5%
6 of 10 profile fields complete.
- Missing: Biography (150+ characters)
- Missing: Photo
- Missing: Website
- Missing: Education
Data freshness100 × 5%
Last verified 129 days ago.
- Verified: 2026-06-07
Ranking history
Position in criminal defense rankings in Los Angeles, most recent first.
| Calculated | Position | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | #13 of 38 | 55.4 |
| 13 Oct 2026 | #13 of 38 | 55.5 |
Licences and qualifications
| Jurisdiction | Issuing body | Number | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | State Bar of California | DEMO-US-102485 | 2021 | activeVerified 7 Jun 2026 |
Reviews
3.8
25 reviews
Verified client reviews (demo fixture)
3.7 from 18 reviews, 18 verified
Open review platform (demo fixture)
4.0 from 7 reviews, 0 verified
- Diego S.10 Sept 2026Verified client
Helpful, but communication was slow at times.
- Theo B.20 Jul 2026Verified client
Well prepared for the hearing and kept me informed throughout.
- Mei F.21 May 2026Unverified
Explained my options without pressure and in plain language.
- Rachel A.8 May 2026Unverified
Responsive by phone and email; the fee estimate matched the final bill.
- Zara M.20 Apr 2026Verified client
Responsive by phone and email; the fee estimate matched the final bill.
- Samuel K.16 Apr 2025Unverified
Responsive by phone and email; the fee estimate matched the final bill.
Offices
Data sources
Every fact on this profile is linked to the record it came from. Profile last changed 28 Jan 2025.
- Licensing registry import (demo fixture)Licensing registry1 record
- Verified client reviews (demo fixture)Review source18 records
- Open review platform (demo fixture)Review source7 records