- In practice
- 3 years
- Languages
- English
- Reviews
- 4.4 (23)
- Last verified
- —
About
Kwame Lowell — employment lawyer in Chicago. Fictional demo profile.
Rankings
Score ledger
Employment in Chicago · ranking v1.0.0Each row shows the component score (0–100), its weight and the points it adds. Open a row to see the records it is based on.
Credentials25 × 20%
Active licence on record but not yet verified against the issuing body.
- Illinois licence — unverified
Relevant experience34 × 15%
2 years practising in this area.
- Relevant years counted: 2
Specialization100 × 15%
Primary practice area; practises in 2 area(s) in total.
- Practice areas: 2
Verified reputation67 × 15%
23 review(s) from 2 source(s), 4.809 effective after recency, verification and authority weighting. Adjusted rating 3.69/5.
- Source #3: 3.106 effective reviews
- Source #4: 1.703 effective reviews
Professional recognition0 × 10%
No professional recognition on record.
Relevant track record0 × 10%
No publicly sourced matters on record.
Client experience54 × 5%
Too few enquiries to measure responsiveness; neutral value blended with verified review volume.
- Verified reviews: 9
Profile & data quality70 × 5%
7 of 10 profile fields complete.
- Missing: Biography (150+ characters)
- Missing: Photo
- Missing: Website
Data freshness60 × 5%
Never verified; last updated 33 days ago (40% penalty).
- Updated: 2026-08-13
Ranking history
Position in employment rankings in Chicago, most recent first.
| Calculated | Position | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | #25 of 33 | 44.3 |
Licences and qualifications
| Jurisdiction | Issuing body | Number | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois | Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of Illinois | DEMO-US-102870 | 2023 | activeNot verified |
- J.D., Gulf State University Law Center (2022)
Reviews
4.4
23 reviews
Verified client reviews (demo fixture)
4.4 from 9 reviews, 9 verified
Open review platform (demo fixture)
4.3 from 14 reviews, 0 verified
- Patrick N.24 Jun 2026Unverified
Good result, although the process took longer than expected.
- Malik F.25 May 2026Unverified
Responsive by phone and email; the fee estimate matched the final bill.
- Rafael C.25 Jan 2026Unverified
Responsive by phone and email; the fee estimate matched the final bill.
- Clara C.23 Nov 2025Unverified
Good result, although the process took longer than expected.
- Hiroshi N.7 Sept 2025Verified client
Helpful, but communication was slow at times.
- Aisha Z.15 Jul 2025Verified client
Thorough and calm under pressure. Would hire again.
Offices
Data sources
Every fact on this profile is linked to the record it came from. Profile last changed 13 Aug 2026.
- Licensing registry import (demo fixture)Licensing registry1 record
- Verified client reviews (demo fixture)Review source9 records
- Open review platform (demo fixture)Review source14 records